He doesnt want us to cut through our chains, he wants us to cut through our feet.

Would we viewSawin a more favorable light if there was only one film to the series name?

Surely more money for a project is good though, right?

Saw-Movie-Shawnee-Smith

Image by Collider Staff

The suspension of disbelief is broken very quickly how could the killers kidnap this many people?

How could they possibly set up these traps, and get the materials without being detected?

For practical FX gore fans, it might be fun, but the horror is lost.

Dr. Lawrence Gordon crawling on the floor and crying in Saw

Image Via Lionsgate

This continues to be a problem withSawsequels, the traps keep working.

This is where the franchises label oftorture porncomes from because the first film doesnt really apply.

This enhances the film while also keeping these scenes within budget.

Tobin Bell from Saw

Theres a simple reason for this: the story doesnt make any sense.

It never made sense, and it only gets worse as the sequels continue.

In the first film, this inconsistency is relatively contained, but that ends pretty quickly.

Saw-Reverse-Bear-Trap-2

Image Via Lionsgate

TheSawseries is pretty clumsy with its social commentary, but its commendable.

Why is the janitor being punished?

Apparently, his crime is being a smoker despite a family history of heart disease.

Saw 3D: The Final Chapter

Before the movie can even set up a point, it ruins it.

By keeping the film to one entry, most of these bigger problems stay nitpicks.

Too much attention, and they balloon into something worse.

Costas Mandylor in Saw VI

Image via Lionsgate

“Game over” shouldn’t have just been a final line, it should’ve been a promise.

Saw